Common Core and the Promise of Formative Assessment
The value of formative assessment has been recognized by the consortiums designing the Common Core. The problem is that in their vision students will take formative tests between the scheduled summative assessments. After decades of research on formative assessment and abundance of definitions, this approach is arguably not formative assessment. Definitions of formative assessment include the words on-going process, embedded, feedback loop, student engaged, and responsive.
Don’t be fooled. There is no such thing as a
formative test! You can’t give a test on a moment’s notice when it becomes
apparent that the meaning of .053 or the global changes that occurred as a
result of 9/11 are not fully clear to students. At that very moment, formative
strategies such as signaling or feathers and salt can illuminate points of
confusion. This is far more effective than waiting for the formative interim “test”
in four weeks.
We must not miss the opportunity that minute by minute formative assessments, from the start of a lesson to its conclusion, can provide. Improvement comes when students understand expectations, receive immediate feedback, get advice on next steps, and take responsibility for learning. Don’t be misled into thinking that a one-shot measure can supply the same insights as an ongoing process of gathering evidence and responding meaningfully.
1 Comments:
I noticed this, too, in reading the report “Coming Together to Raise Achievement: New Assessments for the Common Core State Standards” (July 2011) for our class through UNH. It’s interesting to note that PARCC calls it “formative”, which you point out is a misnomer. However, SBAC calls it interim, which I take to mean it’s a summative assessment, though “no stakes”. Maybe Smarter Balanced is really “smarter”!?! The concern with PARCC’s approach is that by using complex terminology, those who know no better think that this is scientific and insightful.....which may help to ease the pain of taxpayers who plunked down the $186 MM PARCC received to develop their tests. I’m still not convinced that national assessment is the best answer to national standards, and the mixed review of this by my “Socratic Circle” shows I’m not alone. But that’s another topic....
I’m all for formative assessment. There is nothing worse for a teacher to deliver a dazzling lesson then look up to see a glazed look on the faces of her students. Or to ask a question only to receive a myriad of answers, all incorrect! Checking along the way is the best way to go. And sometimes the sniff test is better than a bells-and-whistles humdinger of a standardized assessment!
P.S. Congratulations on your second book publication. It’s fantastic to have been taught by a true expert on the topic of assessment!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home